Health

August 27, 2007

Children’s Cold and Cough Medicines – Can They Really Be So Dangerous? Yes.

MedicineLast month, the FDA issued this advisory warning to parents: NEVER give cough and cold medicines to children younger than 2 years old unless your doctor has instructed you to do so. The agency is very concerned about the hundreds of adverse reactions and several deaths resulting from popular children’s medicines containing dextromethorphan (often DM in a drug’s brand name) and pseudoephedrine (a decongestant). Adverse effects include hallucinations and abnormal movements (dextromethorphan) and increased blood pressure and irregular heartbeats (pseudoephedrine). Accidental overdoses happen for at least three reasons: 1) Parents buy different branded products that have the same active ingredient, and they give the child a double dose; 2) “Infant” formulations are about triple-strength to “children’s” strength (with a special dose-measurer because babies can only swallow so much fluid) and sleep-deprived parents can easily give the infant too much medicine; 3) A child with several well-meaning relatives and caregivers can be given medicine by each without the other’s knowledge. Pharmaceutical companies are now substituting the decongestant phenylephrine in place of pseudoephedrine in their over-the-counter versions due to FDA legislation.

The Blue Lake take on it:
This is a tough one. Children in the U.S. average 6-10 colds per year, many more than adults. When your child is sick, you would do almost anything to “make it go away.” It’s not worth the risk to give OTC cold/cough medicines to the under-2-years set without first talking to your pediatrician. But it is important to know that these active ingredients were approved for use in children years ago, before testing on children was required. Most children’s cough and cold formulations still have not been thoroughly tested in children, and recent studies show that they work no better than placebos. Read The American Medical Association’s article to find out more. We agree with the position of Dr. Wayne Snodgrass, the chair of The American Academy of Pediatrics who says, “Personally in a common cold in a young child, I wouldn’t recommend these agents.” Dr. Snodgrass is one of the authors of a petition to the FDA to ban marketing of these drugs for children less than 6 years of age. If you do decide to use these drugs, pay close attention to labels and educate yourself on dosages. The East Coast grocery chain Wegman’s has an online explanation of children’s medicinesincluding dosage guidelines.

July 20, 2007

Pushing Sugar – Breakfast Food Industry Tries Self-Regulation

Sugar
Newspapers across the U.S. carried this story last month: the Kellogg Company announced that they will discontinue advertising products that contain more than 12 grams of sugar per serving, 2 grams of saturated fat or 200 calories during children's television programming. What's behind this decision? Two advocacy groups, including Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood, were preparing a lawsuit against Kellogg and Nickelodeon under a Massachusetts law that limits the marketing of junk food to kids. After a year of negotiations, the food giant agreed to these terms and the lawsuit plans were dropped. What does this mean to you? There are four grams in a teaspoon of sugar or a single sugar cube. Because of the work done by CCFC, your child is much less likely to see an ad for Cocoa Krispies and dozens of other sugar-laden products.



The Blue Lake take on it:
First, we salute the people at Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood for showing that grassroots organizations can impact influential corporate behavior. Now, about that sugar… it's easy to do your homework online. Market leaders Kellogg and General Mills do a good job of making nutrition information available. Note the serving size – higher sugar content cereal servings often report smaller portions (¾ cup) than less sugary choices (1 cup). FYI, a single unfrosted Blueberry Pop-Tart has 18 grams of sugar. Eight ounces of Sprite (two-thirds of a can) has 26 grams of sugar. And 100% real fruit juice? Eight ounces of some popular choices: orange juice (22g), apple juice (26g), grape juice (38g). And finally, the Lawrence Hall of Science at UC Berkeley has a fun set of activities for kids to explore sugar in their lives.


June 15, 2007

The Kid's Menu – enough with the Chicken Nuggets!

NuggetsA funny column titled Don't Point That Menu at My Child, Please by David Kamp, a writer for Vanity Fair, GQ and The New York Times makes this point: "In short, I came to the realization that America is in the grips of a nefarious chicken-finger pandemic, in which a blandly tasty foodstuff has somehow become the de facto official nibble of our young." Kamp explores how this came to be (1983: McDonald's launches McNugget) and who is fighting back. Tony Miller at Latitude 41 (Columbus, OH) told Kamp: "Our kid's menu features zero fried foods. We do grilled organic chicken teriyaki, a seared fillet of whatever fish is in season, and a four-ounce fillet of natural beef with smashed potatoes. I have not received a single negative reaction from adults or kids. Not one. The kids say ‘Man, that's the best steak I've ever eaten!'."

The Blue Lake take on it:
We asked Duskie Estes and John Stewart (chef/owners of Zazu and Bovolo restaurants in Sonoma Valley's wine country) and parents of Brydie and MacKenzie (young subscribers to Tessy & Tab) what they think and what they offer. Their own daughters define the spectrum: one eats stinky cheeses, pig heart and olives, and the other eats only white rice, fruit and french fries. As chefs, they say that a basic kid's menu makes it easy for kids to get something and parents to enjoy a restaurant. If you don't see something you like on the kid's menu, ask for a kid's portion from the adult menu. Here are Seven Tips for Eating Out With Kids by the author of Healthy Foods for Healthy Kids.

May 25, 2007

Video Games and Violence

VideogamesAfter the Virginia Tech tragedy in April, a debate erupted about whether video games influenced the killer. I won't rehash that here – let's just say there are two sides to every story. But as a parent, you should know there is evidence that playing violent video games leads to aggressive behavior in children. Recent studies led by Iowa State University's Distinguished Professor of Psychology, Dr. Craig Anderson, show that playing a lot of violent video games is related to having more aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. Furthermore, playing violent games is also related to children being less willing to be caring and helpful towards their peers. When parents limited their children's exposure to violent video games, these behaviors were reduced.


The Blue Lake take on it:
Read the full article on this study published by the American Psychology Association. It's hard to keep video games out of your child's life – remember there are lots of non-violent choices like Tetris, virtual pets and sports games.

May 18, 2007

Marketing the Baby Genius

Genius
Last year, Harvard psychologist Susan Linn filed a complaint with the federal trade commission, arguing that advertisements for so-called "baby-genius" videos in the US are false and deceptive because there is no evidence watching them helps babies learn. "The bind is that parents in this country are under terrible stress, so the idea that these videos might be educational is helpful for them, because it makes it OK to put babies in front of screens," said Ms Linn, co-founder of the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood. "These companies have been doing a really good job of convincing parents these videos are education - but there's no evidence that television is beneficial, and some evidence that it may be harmful." 


The Blue Lake take on it:
Look beyond the marketing. If you choose to have your baby watch videos, we recommend disciplined moderation. It's important to monitor what your kids watch and to avoid a daily ritual or "video as reward" system. As kids grow older, video fare aimed at them becomes more commercial. That's the focus of The Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood, and their website is worth reviewing. Richard Hill, a reporter from our hometown paper The Oregonian, has just covered the latest studies.